Co-author: Angela Van-Sickle, Ph.D., CCC-SLP

Clinicians often make comments concerning mastication in clinical and instrumental swallowing assessments. “Prolonged mastication,” “inefficient chewing,” “no rotary jaw movements,” and the like. The issue is there is very little information in dysphagia textbooks or the speech pathology literature related to this process. In addition, given that most clinicians take one course in swallowing and swallowing disorders, it is not possible to cover anatomy, physiology, assessment, and treatment in great detail. This leaves us in a quandary. We are left to figure out details on our own. This often leads to confusion and misunderstanding which, in turn, can be unintentionally detrimental to patient quality of life. With this in mind, we undertook a project to gain a greater understanding of the complex process of mastication. The first step in the journey took us outside of the typical dysphagia literature and into the dental arena. For us, this was fascinating yet uncharted territory.  Our hope is to lay a foundation that will whet the appetite for further investigation while improving our assessment skills, which in turn will benefit the patients who trust us with their care.

What is the big deal about mastication?

From a mechanical standpoint, chewing represents the beginning of the digestion process. It is the time when food is reduced in size, while water in the saliva moistens the particles, and salivary mucins bind the food into a cohesive and slippery bolus that can be easily swallowed (Pedersen, Bardow, Jensen, & Nauntofte, 2002). Perhaps more important is the sensory experience of mastication which allows the savoring of food tastes and the experience of food texture (van der Bilt, Engelen, Pereira, van der Glas, & Abbink, 2006).  This may be the motivation for eating. 

What is involved?

It is thought that all solids, regardless of bite size and texture, are managed in a stereotypical matter. That is to say, the tongue transports the food from the mouth to the post-canine teeth which is then processed by mastication cycles until the food is softened. Large particles are further broken down by the premolar teeth into small particles. All the while, saliva is being added to create a manageable bolus (Thexton, 1992; Van Der Bilt, 2011). This is modulated by a central pattern generator (CPG) located in the brainstem (Dellow & Lund, 1971; Morquette et al., 2012).  The output of the CPG is modified by inputs that descend from higher centers of the brain and by feedback from sensory receptors. Intraoral touch receptors, muscle spindles in the jaw-closing muscles, and specialized mechanoreceptors in the periodontal ligament have influence movement parameters (Lund, 1991). The main variables that explain differences in the pattern of human mastication are the subjects themselves, their age, the type of food being eaten, and time during a sequence of movements (Lund & Kolta, 2006). 

Breaking it down

The Role of the jaw

Efficient chewing requires intact muscle activity to cause the jaw to exert the forces necessary to cut or grind the food. The muscle force generated is determined by the texture of the food. More activity occurs with harder foods (Mioche, Bourdiol, Martin, & Noel, 1999). 

Significantly higher maximum bite forces are reported for men (Shiga, Kobayashi, Katsuyama, Yokoyama, & Arakawa, 2012). Maximum bite force has been found to decrease with age. This may be due to sarcopenia or changes in food preferences related to dentition. Frailty also impacts bite force in the aged population (Hatch, Shinkai, Sakai, Rugh, & Paunovich, 2001). One study (Miura, 2001) found bite force was significantly diminished in frail, elderly individuals when compared with age match healthy individuals, regardless of dentition. 

The good news is there is some evidence that aggressive isometric exercise may increase bite force. Maximum and submaximum voluntary bite forces were measured in young adults. Subjects performed isometric clenches against a soft maxillary splint for six 1-min sessions at 75% of their one repetition maximum every day over a 6-week period. After exercise, subjects increased their maximum bite forces by 37% (Thompson, Throckmorton, & Buschang, 2001).  An older study (Kiliarisdis, 1995) found having participants chew a special hard chewing gum one hour daily for 28 days significantly increased maximal bite force. Additionally, the force remained at “high levels” two weeks after stopping the intervention. 

Bite force does not necessarily correlate to chewing cycles. People seem to have a preference for slow chewing versus fast chewing (Van Der Bilt, 2011). Large standard deviations in the number of chewing cycles have been reported. Perhaps the most compelling study examined the number of chewing cycles in 87 dentate subjects when given 9.1 cm3 of peanuts. The number of cycles ranged from 17 to 110 (Engelen, Fontijn-Tekamp, van der Bilt, 2005). Interesting that the urge to swallow seems to be triggered by size of the food particles and lubrication of the bolus (Lucas, 1986; Olthoff, 1984; van der Bilt, van der Glas, Olthoff, & Bosman, 1991). Food characteristics (hardness, volume, etc.)  also have a large influence on chewing cycles (van der Bilt et al., 2006)  This information would suggest statements such as “prolonged mastication” may lack validity. 

Do teeth matter? 

Some oral proprioceptors seem to originate in the periodontal ligament and aid in the perception of food texture and particle size (Anderson, Hannam, & Mathews, 1970). There are neural connections between periodontal sensory nuclei and the muscles of mastication (Rissin, House, Manly, & Kapur, 1978). This provides a sensory advantage to dentate individuals. 

Mechanically, denture wearers display longer chewing times and swallow larger particle sizes. Particle size reduction at time of swallowing is significantly poorer for denture wearers than for their aged dentate counterparts, despite an increase in chewing strokes (Mishellany-Dutour, Renaud, Peyron, Rimek, & Woda, 2008). With this in mind, when evaluating patients with dentures such changes should be anticipated. 

Denture adhesive seems to improve mastication abilities (Fujimori, Hirano, & Hayakawa, 2002). Although there are exceptions, edentulous individuals tend to avoid foods that are difficult to chew possibly leading to nutritional compromise (Sheiham, 2000). In addition, wearing dentures has been associated with decreased quality of life (Koshino et al., 2006).

Then there is the tongue

The role of the tongue has been studied for many years. Abd-El-Malek (1955) described the sequence as follows: 

  • The preparatory stage: the tongue in a resting position on the floor of the mouth becoming “trough-like” with the dorsum pointing upwards.
  • The throwing stage: The tongue twist over on one side, turning through a right angle so that the dorsum faces the lingual surface of the teeth to “throw” the food on the surface of the lower molars.
  • The guarding stage: The tongue remains twisted while the dorsum presses on the edges of the teeth to prevent he food from falling into the buccal cavity. The tongue and the buccal muscle act together to keep the food between the teeth.
  • The sorting out stage: The food is pushed onto the tongue by the buccal muscle as the tongue regains a more neutral position. The movement is rapid and “jerky” sorting out larger particles that need to be sent back to the teeth for further grinding. This is repeated until the appropriate particle size is reached. 
  • The stage of bolus formation: The tongue alternates from to side to mix the food with saliva. 

Since 1955, the literature has included the role of the tongue pressure against the hard palate and the coordination with jaw movement. In summary, the tongue plays a series of important roles in mastication by moving in coordination with the jaw and controlling pressure against the hard palate, while moving the food to the teeth (Hori, Ono, & Nokubi, 2006).

Interestingly, a recent systematic review of lingual exercises (Smaoui, 2019) found nothing in the literature to support the idea that lingual resistance training reduces oral residue. Currently only anecdotal evidence exists. Keeping good clinical data may help tease out this question. 

What about saliva?

Adequate saliva is essential for efficient mastication. The water in saliva moistens the food particles, whereas the salivary mucins bind masticated food into a coherent and slippery bolus that can be easily swallowed (Pedersen et al., 2002). The role of saliva for chewing and swallowing has been demonstrated by the finding that the number of chewing cycles needed before swallowing significantly increases after experimentally induced oral dryness (Liedberg & Owall, 1991).  Liedberg et al. (1991) also found that decreased saliva negatively influenced bolus cohesion and bolus propulsion. Additionally, age-related decreases in bite force and salivary flow rates show that, regardless of age or gender, bite force is correlated with salivary flow (Yeh et al., 2011). Xerostomia affects the ability to chew and start a swallow. This leads to avoidance of certain foods, which raises the possibility that it could contribute to undernutrition in older persons (Loesche et al., 1995). Understanding this fact, it is important to review medications which are known to cause xerostomia. 

A few random thoughts

It is important to understand that the airway remains open during mastication and respiratory rhythm changes. Respiratory frequency increases and total airway resistance increases  (Matsuo, Hiiemae, Gonzalez-Fernandez, & Palmer, 2008). Nasal rather than mouth breathing should be occurring during chewing (Matsuo et al., 2008). Additionally, it is normal for the bolus to arrogate in the vallecular space (Palmer, 1998). This should not be considered “premature spillage.” 

So, what do we know?

Mastication is much too complex to assess by watching someone eat as there are many components. At this point, imaging alone may not be sufficient to make a complete assessment of masticatory abilities.  Testing of bite force, saliva flow, lingual agility, dentition, and oral pressures as well as sensation of oral structures will provide needed information. Further assessment of particle size may be important. There is a validated test of mastication, The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS). The TOMASS provides age and gender information related to masticatory cycles per cracker, swallows per cracker, total time in seconds, masticatory cycles per bite, swallows per bite, time per bite, time per masticatory cycle, and time per swallow (Huckabee et al., 2017).  Although this test has some limitations, it is a good place to begin.

References

Abd-El-Malek, S. (1955). The part played by the tongue in mastication and deglutition. J Anat, 89(2), 250-254. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14367222

Anderson, D. J., Hannam, A. G., & Mathews, B. (1970). Sensory mechanisms in mammalian teeth and their supporting structures. Physiol Rev, 50(2), 171-195. doi:10.1152/physrev.1970.50.2.171

Dellow, P. G., & Lund, J. P. (1971). Evidence for central timing of rhythmical mastication. J Physiol, 215(1), 1-13. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009454

Engelen, L., Fontijn-Tekamp, F., van der Bilt, A. (2005). The influence of product and oral charactersitics on swallowing. Arch Oral Biol, 50, 739-746. 

Fujimori, T., Hirano, S., & Hayakawa, I. (2002). Effects of a denture adhesive on masticatory functions for complete denture wearers–consideration for the condition of denture-bearing tissues. J Med Dent Sci, 49(4), 151-156. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12641386

Hatch, J. P., Shinkai, R. S., Sakai, S., Rugh, J. D., & Paunovich, E. D. (2001). Determinants of masticatory performance in dentate adults. Arch Oral Biol, 46(7), 641-648. doi:10.1016/s0003-9969(01)00023-1

Hori, K., Ono, T., & Nokubi, T. (2006). Coordination of tongue pressure and jaw movement in mastication. J Dent Res, 85(2), 187-191. doi:10.1177/154405910608500214

Huckabee, M., McIntosh, T., Fuller, L, Curry, M., Thomas, P., Walshe, M., McCague, E., Battel, I., Nogueira, D., Frank, U., van den Engel-Hoek, L., & Sella-Weiss, O. (2017). The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): reliability, validity and international normative data.  Int J Lang Commun Disord, 53(1), 144-156.

Kiliarisdis, S., Mihail, O., Tzakis, M., Carlsson, G. (1995). Effects of fatigue and chewing training on maximal bite force and endurance. American Journal of Orhodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 107(4), 372-378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70089-7

Koshino, H., Hirai, T., Ishijima, T., Tsukagoshi, H., Ishigami, T., & Tanaka, Y. (2006). Quality of life and masticatory function in denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil, 33(5), 323-329. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01152.x

Liedberg, B., & Owall, B. (1991). Masticatory ability in experimentally induced xerostomia. Dysphagia, 6(4), 211-213. doi:10.1007/bf02493529

Loesche, W. J., Bromberg, J., Terpenning, M. S., Bretz, W. A., Dominguez, B. L., Grossman, N. S., & Langmore, S. E. (1995). Xerostomia, xerogenic medications and food avoidances in selected geriatric groups. J Am Geriatr Soc, 43(4), 401-407. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb05815.x

Lucas, P., Luke, D. (1986). Is food particle size a criterion for the initiation of swallowing? Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 13(2), 127-136. 

Lund, J. P. (1991). Mastication and its control by the brain stem. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 2(1), 33-64. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1912143

Lund, J. P., & Kolta, A. (2006). Generation of the central masticatory pattern and its modification by sensory feedback. Dysphagia, 21(3), 167-174. doi:10.1007/s00455-006-9027-6

Matsuo, K., Hiiemae, K. M., Gonzalez-Fernandez, M., & Palmer, J. B. (2008). Respiration during feeding on solid food: alterations in breathing during mastication, pharyngeal bolus aggregation, and swallowing. J Appl Physiol (1985), 104(3), 674-681. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00527.2007

Mioche, L., Bourdiol, P., Martin, J. F., & Noel, Y. (1999). Variations in human masseter and temporalis muscle activity related to food texture during free and side-imposed mastication. Arch Oral Biol, 44(12), 1005-1012. doi:10.1016/s0003-9969(99)00103-x

Mishellany-Dutour, A., Renaud, J., Peyron, M. A., Rimek, F., & Woda, A. (2008). Is the goal of mastication reached in young dentates, aged dentates and aged denture wearers? Br J Nutr, 99(1), 121-128. doi:10.1017/S0007114507795284

Miura, H., Watanbe, S., Isogai, E., Miura., K. . (2001). Comparison of maximum bite force and dentate status etween healthy and frail elderly persons. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 28(6), 592-595. 

Morquette, P., Lavoie, R., Fhima, M. D., Lamoureux, X., Verdier, D., & Kolta, A. (2012). Generation of the masticatory central pattern and its modulation by sensory feedback. Prog Neurobiol, 96(3), 340-355. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.01.011

Olthoff, L., Van Der Bilt, F., Bosman, F., Kleizen, H. (1984). Distribution of particle size in food communted by human mastication. Archs oral Biol, 29(11), 899-203. 

Palmer, J. B. (1998). Bolus aggregation in the oropharynx does not depend on gravity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 79(6), 691-696. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9630151

Pedersen, A. M., Bardow, A., Jensen, S. B., & Nauntofte, B. (2002). Saliva and gastrointestinal functions of taste, mastication, swallowing and digestion. Oral Dis, 8(3), 117-129. doi:10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.02851.x

Rissin, L., House, J. E., Manly, R. S., & Kapur, K. K. (1978). Clinical comparison of masticatory performance and electromyographic activity of patients with complete dentures, overdentures, and natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent, 39(5), 508-511. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(78)80181-4

Sheiham, A., Steele, J. (2000). Does the condtion nof the mouth and teeth affect the ability to eat certain foods, nutrient and dietary intake and nutrional status amongst older people? Public Health Nutrition, 4(3), 797-798. 

Shiga, H., Kobayashi, Y., Katsuyama, H., Yokoyama, M., & Arakawa, I. (2012). Gender difference in masticatory performance in dentate adults. J Prosthodont Res, 56(3), 166-169. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2012.02.001

Smaoui, S., Langridge, A., Steele, C. (2019). The effect of lingual resistance training interventions on adult swallow function: A systematic review. Dysphagia, In Press

Thexton, A. J. (1992). Mastication and swallowing: an overview. Br Dent J, 173(6), 197-206. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4808002

Thompson, D. J., Throckmorton, G. S., & Buschang, P. H. (2001). The effects of isometric exercise on maximum voluntary bite forces and jaw muscle strength and endurance. J Oral Rehabil, 28(10), 909-917. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00772.x

Van Der Bilt, A. (2011). Assessment of mastication with implications for oral rehabilitation: a review. J Oral Rehabil, 38(10), 754-780. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02197.x

van der Bilt, A., Engelen, L. Pereira, L., van der Glas, H., and Abbink, J. . (2006). Oral physiology and mastication. Physiol Behav, 89(1), 22-27. 

van der Bilt, A., van der Glas, H. W., Olthoff, L. W., & Bosman, F. (1991). The effect of particle size reduction on the jaw gape in human mastication. J Dent Res, 70(5), 931-937. doi:10.1177/00220345910700051301

Yeh, S. J., Huang, K. Y., Wang, T. G., Chen, Y. C., Chen, C. H., Tang, S. C., . . . Jeng, J. S. (2011). Dysphagia screening decreases pneumonia in acute stroke patients admitted to the stroke intensive care unit. J Neurol Sci, 306(1-2), 38-41. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2011.04.001

5 COMMENTS

  1. The research on mastication and dentures and the association of denture wearers to have a decreased quality of life was really interesting. Do you think that denture wearers can’t feel the the physical contact between the chewing and the food? Because there are no longer nerves going in to the teeth (because, well, dentures) that some of the satisfaction of chewing is lost? I don’t know if that would impact the quality of life, but I bet there is a correlation between that and the fact that they have to be more careful about what they eat.

    • Thanks for the interesting question. Although it is totally speculation based on my understanding of mastication as this point, decreased QoL may be due to having to alter the way food is eaten so chewing requires more active cognition. The other thing that might be impacting this is the tactile experience. With a large piece of plastic covering the hard palate the taste and feeling of food is changed. Perhaps some others have ideas.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here